PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES' HEALTH CARE PLANS LACK KEY REFORM ELEMENTS, ASPEN INSTITUTE FINDS
The Institute's analysis is based on a detailed questionnaire submitted to each campaign. The questionnaire and the principles that guided the analysis were developed by the bipartisan Aspen Health Stewardship Project. The Project's work is guided by leaders from the public, private and nonprofit sectors dedicated to improving the health care system. The Project's core principles, the questionnaire and the full response by each candidate can be found on the Project's Web site, www.AspenHealthStewardship.org.
"While the candidates have clearly focused on the issue and have proposed different approaches, no one plan takes into account all of the core principles we think are needed to build a healthier nation," said
Even as they affirmed the importance of the Project's core principles, the candidates failed to fully grasp the fundamental changes required to transform the nation's ailing health care system. This was apparent even in basic questions, such as:
Question: How will you define and measure the success of your health proposals and their impact on health outcomes?
-- Clinton commented on the need to "shift our system from focusing on
and providing sick care to focusing on and providing well care,"
but stopped short of directly answering the question.
-- McCain discussed the importance of "injecting competition into all
aspects of health care," controlling costs, managing chronic
diseases and the need to "increase personal responsibility for our
health," but did not answer how he would define or measure success.
-- Obama would "require hospitals, health care providers and insurers
to report quality outcomes to the government and the public," he
responded. He proposed to establish and monitor a "report
card" for the various parts of our health care system but gave no
details on what it would look like or how it would function.
"If we're going to create a just, effective and sustainable health care system, we need to begin by having a debate on terms that will get us there, and that means discussing more than access and cost," said Project Co-Chair
The lack of clear solutions for meaningful reform was evident throughout the responses.
For instance, the candidates did not fully consider the role of patients as drivers of their own health, did not offer facts to back up their assertions, and did not describe how they would improve key programs. Examples include:
Question: What will you do to ensure that health information is readily accessible, meaningful and accurate so that it helps people make decisions and take action?
-- Clinton proposed to drive a "paperless revolution," requiring
providers who participate in federal programs to "adopt private,
secure, and interoperable technology." Such an approach may lead to
cost savings and reduced medical errors, which would be a clear
improvement. But her response did not take into consideration consumers
or how they could be empowered by having the right information when
needed.
Question: How would your health care system promote greater equity of health outcomes among men and women of different races, income levels and geographic locales?
-- McCain said "access to insurance is the gateway to better health
care. Providing a fair, equal credit to all is an important step."
He did not, however, offer facts to support his assertion that
individuals with a tax credit would be best positioned to demand better
outcomes and greater equity. Nor did he address the various factors that
impact health disparities.
Question: What will you do to encourage innovation in biomedical research, the science of prevention and the delivery of care? How will you promote the use of these advanced technologies to improve health?
Obama said he would "improve the efficiency of (biomedical research) by improving coordination both within government and across government/ private/non-profit partnerships," adding that an Obama administration would "ensure that we translate scientific progress into improved approaches to disease prevention, early detection and therapy." Obama's response concentrates on increased funding, and yet increased funding alone thus far has not brought more solutions. Additionally, he did not say how he would improve coordination.
"It is important for our next President to lead our nation to true health care reform, and this will be possible only when these complex issues are discussed fully with the public," said Project Director Dr.
Launched in
SOURCE The Aspen Institute
